What solution is right for me?
There are many different solutions when it comes to implementing a gasless swap experience. We’ve put together a decision tree below to help you arrive at the solution that best fits your application.Permit-based Gasless
Use this approach when your app does not control the user’s wallet (e.g. MetaMask, Rainbow, or any external EOA). The user signs an off-chain EIP-3009 or Permit2 message, and Relay’s solver handles everything else — no approval transaction, no gas.How it works
Fees
You can choose to subsidize all destination fees by passingsubsidizeFees: true to the quote api (this effectively subsidizes the first time approval). The user still needs to pay for the origin gas fee. For subsidizing fees you’ll need to make sure you have fee sponsorship set up.
See the full working example: byo-eoa-permit
ERC-4337 Gasless
Use this approach if your app already uses ERC-4337 smart accounts. ERC-4337 UserOperations normally require gas fees, either paid by the sender or a paymaster. With Relay, you set all gas fee fields to 0 and submit thehandleOps call via Relay’s /execute endpoint instead of directly to the EntryPoint. Relay’s relayer submits the transaction and covers the gas.
originGasOverhead
Pass originGasOverhead: 300000 in the /quote/v2 request. This tells Relay how much additional gas the UserOperation adds over a normal EOA transaction, used during simulation to accurately price the fee.
How it works
Submit via Relay
Encode an
EntryPoint.handleOps() call and submit it via POST /execute with subsidizeFees: trueFees
You can choose to subsidize origin fees: passsubsidizeFees: true to the execute api executionOptions.
You can choose to subsidize destination fees: pass subsidizeFees: true to the quote api.
You can choose to subsidize both or none of these. If not subsidized the user pays from the output token.
For subsidizing fees you’ll need to make sure you have fee sponsorship set up.
See the full working example: 4337-gasless
7702 BatchExecutor
Use this approach when your app controls an embedded or custodial wallet and you want gasless execution with any ERC-20 token — not just permit-compatible ones. This leverages EIP-7702 to delegate the user’s EOA to a BatchExecutor contract (Calibur or similar), enabling atomic approve + deposit in a single call.originGasOverhead
Pass originGasOverhead: 80000 in the /quote/v2 request. This tells Relay how much additional gas the Calibur execute() wrapper adds over the raw inner calls (EIP-712 signature verification, batch dispatch, nonce check). This is lower than ERC-4337’s 300000 because there’s no EntryPoint or UserOp validation overhead.
The
80000 value is specific to Calibur. Different BatchExecutor contracts may have different gas overheads — adjust this value based on the implementation you use.How it works
Sign the authorization
Sign an EIP-7702 authorization (off-chain, no gas) delegating the EOA to the BatchExecutor
Submit via Relay
Submit via POST /execute targeting the user’s EOA
Fees
You can choose to subsidize origin fees: passsubsidizeFees: true to the execute api executionOptions.
You can choose to subsidize destination fees: pass subsidizeFees: true to the quote api.
You can choose to subsidize both or none of these. If not subsidized the user pays from the output token.
For subsidizing fees you’ll need to make sure you have fee sponsorship set up.
See the full working example: 7702-batch-executor